THE END

Och så var då klimatdebatten, som det ser ut, i praktiken över. Två amerikanska klimatförespråkare (eller vad man nu skall kalla dom) kastar nu nämligen finalt in handduken:

Climate science, even at its most uncontroversial, could never motivate the remaking of the entire global energy economy. Efforts to use climate science to threaten an apocalyptic future should we fail to embrace green proposals, and to characterize present-day natural disasters as terrifying previews of an impending day of reckoning, have only served to undermine the credibility of both climate science and progressive energy policy.

(...)

Greens pushed climate scientists to become outspoken advocates of action to address global warming. Captivated by the notion that their voices and expertise were singularly necessary to save the world, some climate scientists attempted to oblige. The result is that the use, and misuse, of climate science by advocates began to wash back into the science itself.

(...)

Climate science can still usefully inform us about the possible trajectories of the global climate and help us prepare for extreme weather and natural disasters, whether climate change ultimately results in their intensification or not. And understood in its proper role, as one of many reasons why we should decarbonize the global economy, climate science can even help contribute to the case for taking such action. But so long as environmentalists continue to demand that climate science drive the transformation of the global energy economy, neither the science, nor efforts to address climate change, will be well served.

Läs hela artikeln här.
.
Förutom en närmast total reträtt i sakfrågan innehåller alltså texten också ett indirekt medgivande om att det hela tiden - åtminstone för dessa två - varit en politisk agenda som stått i centrum, inte "klimatforskningen" och dess framtrixade resultat. Och därmed får läsaren ursäkta, men nu måste jag bara få brassa av kommentarernas kommentar, mödan för all svett jag - och givetvis alla andra "skeptiker" - i åratal lagt ner på att sprida information om detta spektakel:

.

- Vad vad det jag sa!!!

.

Tillägg: Här är ytterligare en mycket intressant artikel i ämnet...

Nothing is easier than coming up with computer models that prove almost anything. Back during the 1970s, there were computer models predicting mass starvation and global cooling. The utter failure of those predictions ought to make us at least skeptical of computer models, especially computer models based on data that advocates want to keep from public view or even "lose" when investigators start closing in.

Tillägg II: Och Golfströmmen verkar inte stanna...